Database Optimization Tool
Maintenance audit

Postgres autovacuum health check for drift and dead rows

Database Optimization Tool reviews autovacuum health from evidence-focused PostgreSQL statistics, highlighting dead-row pressure, stale maintenance timestamps, and tables that need human planning.

01
Dead-row pressure
02
Autovacuum drift
03
Analyze freshness
04
Maintenance history review
01

Dead rows and stale maintenance

The check compares estimated live rows, estimated dead rows, last vacuum, last autovacuum, last analyze, and table size to identify tables where maintenance may be falling behind.

02

Bloat signals without unsafe claims

Database Optimization Tool can flag bloat signals and relation growth patterns, but it does not claim exact reclaimable space unless the collected evidence supports that level of detail.

03

Autovacuum drift diagnosis

Tables with old autovacuum or analyze timestamps, high dead-row ratios, or heavy write activity become review candidates for threshold, scale factor, and scheduling analysis.

04

No automatic VACUUM

The product stays evidence-focused. It does not run VACUUM, change autovacuum settings, or perform repairs. Findings are meant to support a planned maintenance decision.

Keep exploring

Use these short guides to compare query pressure, index decisions, and maintenance signals before planning production work.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

These answers describe the product focus: careful database evidence, clear findings, and team-approved next steps.

Does Database Optimization Tool run VACUUM or VACUUM FULL?

No. It only reads statistics and reports maintenance candidates. Any vacuum command, lock-risk review, or configuration change stays with the database owner.

What is autovacuum drift?

Autovacuum drift means table changes appear to outpace maintenance signals, such as rising dead rows, old vacuum timestamps, or stale analyze data on important tables.

Can dead rows explain slow queries?

They can contribute, especially with larger tables and stale planner statistics. The report treats dead rows as one signal alongside table size, scan behavior, and query evidence.

What should teams do after a high-risk finding?

Review table workload, confirm planner statistics, inspect maintenance history, estimate lock and I/O risk, then schedule the safest manual maintenance path.